|
Previous
Can
CCA treated Southern Pine be produced for export markets?
Yes, but only if it's intended for the same end-uses
allowed by the EPA in the U.S. Regardless of the lumber's
destination, U.S. treaters are prohibited from producing CCA
treated lumber for uses excluded from the CCA registration.
Click
here to view U.S. EPA guidance on export and importation of
CCA preservative treated wood.
Can
anything be done to make special provisions for CCA treated
lumber destined for export
markets?
No. The deadline for petitioning for changes to
the CCA label was in May 2002. The EPA is not accepting any
modifications.
Can
CCA be exported to foreign treaters?
Yes, the chemical can and will continue to be exported
to treaters in foreign countries. Likewise, the chemical can
be manufactured in foreign countries.
Can
CCA treated lumber be treated in foreign countries and exported
back to the U.S.?
Yes, but the regulations still apply regarding end-use.
Imported CCA treated lumber can only be used in the specified
industrial applications.
What
about CCA usage in Puerto Rico?
As far as we understand it, EPA regulations on CCA
also apply to Puerto Rico. Lumber treated with CCA in Puerto
Rico as well as CCA treated lumber shipped to Puerto Rico
fall under the same rules as domestic U.S. markets.
Are
alternative chemicals being adopted in foreign countries?
Yes, albeit piecemeal. Some treaters in Honduras
and South America are taking steps towards copper based alternatives.
Treating industries and governments in South America are cognizant
of the issues surrounding CCA in the U.S., although there
is no government mandate for its phase-out.
Will
CCA treated lumber produced in foreign markets threaten exports
of Southern Pine
treated with
alternative chemicals?
South American and Honduran softwood lumber is already
cost competitive against Southern Pine. However, that they
can continue to use CCA will most likely not give them an
added cost advantage. There are several reasons why:
(1) Importing CCA is costly -- Import duties and freight significantly
raise the cost of CCA in foreign countries. For example, Brazil's
import duty on CCA is around 35%, and duties are reported
to be cost prohibitive in Chile and Honduras. The added cost
of importing CCA largely erases its cost advantage over alternatives,
which will be used in the U.S.
(2) Foreign treaters do not benefit from volume discounts
- South American and Honduran treaters are typically small-scale
operations, which do not get the same volume discounts on
preservative chemicals that larger-scale treaters in the U.S.
would. Further, due to their small-scale production capacity,
it is doubtful that they can quickly take over export markets.
(3) CCA will likely become more expensive because its cost
will probably rise when it becomes a niche product. Due to
its limited acceptance in the U.S. beginning Jan. 1, 2004,
production economies of scale for CCA will no longer exist.
Thus, CCA exported to foreign treaters will likely carry a
higher cost.
What
can we do to ensure acceptance of the new preservatives in export
markets?
SPC is explaining the transition to new preservatives to
key importers/specifiers by way of seminars and trade shows
throughout the Caribbean. SPC has also developed two four-page
newsletters explaining the transition, which it will mail
directly to key buyers in the Caribbean. SPC member treaters
are encouraged to help spread the word to their customers.
Previous
|