
|
 |



| Southern Pine Design Values |
TABLE 3: MECHANICALLY GRADED LUMBER
Based on 2002 SPIB Grading Rules
Values in pounds per square inch (psi)
Table 3 Mechanically
Graded Lumber
2" thick or less, 2" and wider |
Based on Normal Use Conditions (MC≤19%)
See Tables A-1 thru A-4 for Adjustment Factors
|
| Grade Designation1
|
Extreme Fiber Stress in Bending Fb
|
Tension
Parallel
to Grain
Ft
|
Horizontal
Shear
Fv3, 4
|
Compression
Perpendicular
to Grain
Fc⊥3
|
Compression
Parallel
to Grain
Fc
|
Modulus
of
Elasticity
E
|
Single Member
Uses
|
Repetitive Member
Uses2
|
| Machine Stress Rated (MSR) Lumber
|
1650f - 1.5E
1800f - 1.6E
1950f - 1.7E
2100f - 1.8E
2250f - 1.9E
2400f - 2.0E
2550f - 2.1E
2700f - 2.2E
|
1650
1800
1950
2100
2250
2400
2550
2700
|
1900
2070
2240
2420
2590
2760
2930
3110
|
1020
1175
1375
1575
1750
1925
2050
2150
|
175
175
175
1905
190
190
190
190
|
565
565
565
8055
805
805
805
805
|
1700
1750
1800
1875
1925
1975
2025
2100
|
1,500,000
1,600,000
1,700,000
1,800,000
1,900,000
2,000,000
2,100,000
2,200,000
|
| Machine Evaluated Lumber (MEL)
|
M - 14
M - 19
M - 23
M - 26
M - 29
M - 30
M - 31
|
1800
2000
2400
2800
1550
2050
2850
|
2070
2300
2760
3220
1780
2360
3280
|
1000
1300
1900
1800
850
1050
1600
|
175
175
1905
190
175
175
190
|
565
565
8055
805
565
565
805
|
1750
1825
1975
2150
1650
1850
2150
|
1,700,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
2,000,000
1,700,000
1,700,000
1,900,000
|
(1) The most commonly produced Mechanically Graded Lumber
grades are given here. See the SPIB Grading Rules for a complete listing
of all MSR and MEL grades.
(2) Repetitive member uses apply to joists, truss chords, rafters, studs,
planks, decking or similar members which are in contact or spaced not
more than 24" on center, are not less than three [3] in number, and are
joined by floor, roof or other load distributing elements adequate to
support the design load. The Repetitive Member Factor, Cr =
1.15, has been included in the listed Repetitive Member Use design values.
(3) When a grade is qualified by test and quality controlled for specific
gravity, the allowable horizontal shear and compression perpendicular-to-grain
design values may be higher. See the SPIB Grading Rules for more
details.
(4) These shear design values are higher than those published in the 1997
NDS® Supplement: Design Values for Wood Construction. Design values,
including these shear design values, should only be applied in conjunction
with the appropriate design provisions in the NDS® . It it
important, therefore, that these new shear design values be used only
in conjunction with the new 2001 NDS®, and not the 1997 NDS®
or earlier editions.
(5) When not qualified for specific gravity, the grademark for mechanically
graded lumber grades with a 1,800,000 psi modulus of elasticity design
value shall include a specific gravity value of .55, a horizontal shear
value of 175 psi, and a compression perpendicular-to-grain value of 565
psi. |
Disclaimer:
The Southern Pine Council™ does not test lumber or establish design values. The purpose of these tables is to collect and organize data available from other sources for the convenience of builders, engineers, architects and other professionals. The Southern Pine design values contained herein are taken from the Standard Grading Rules for Southern Pine Lumber, 2002 Edition, published by the Southern Pine Inspection Bureau, and the adjustment factors are taken from the National Design Specification® (NDS®) for Wood Construction, 2001 Edition, published by the American Forest & Paper Association. Neither the Southern Pine Council™, nor its members, warrant that the data from such sources on which the recommended uses of Southern Pine lumber contained herein are based is correct, and disclaim responsibility for injury or damage resulting from the use of such design values.
The conditions under which lumber is used in construction may vary widely, as does the quality of workmanship and construction methods. Neither the Southern Pine Council™, nor its members, have knowledge of the quality of the workmanship or construction methods used on any construction project, and, accordingly, do not warrant the design or performance of the lumber in completed structures.
|
|
|